Steve schultz writing at work

By Steven Schultz Advice on writing is plentiful — whether for writing short stories or scientific articles: But the writer could have stated the point directly and simply — the products will be formulated and stored as their master records require.

Would the FDA really be fooled? A more reliable and consistent approach would be to base the directive on experiments that identify the time required for this method to eliminate possible variances in results, and state it in unambiguous language: Talk to your doctor before using any over-the-counter drugs.

To detect any obvious high and low filled vials.

What other types of items could etc. Using simple, objective language avoids misunderstanding—the deadline is 4 p. The threat of lab jargon — assuming stock phrases and language are as universally understood as, say, the symbol for benzene — is also no less intense. And close proximity itself is redundant.

Why take a chance? Here are some examples: After a writer ignores too many of the road signs seen here, readers can become annoyed.

I remember seeing in point font a caption to a photo with the attribution: Often, typos are in large type, such as in titles and subheads. To steer clear of the most troublesome, here are some warning signs for writers to heed before setting fingertips to keyboard. Such variances waste resources, time and money through additional testingdelay the release of product or, in stability testing, delay reporting the results to the FDA.

What do you look for? Standard Warning Label For external use only Use only on your skin It is very important that you take or use this exactly as directed. Enjoy our FREE content!

Whose close of business and end of day are we talking about? What, for example, do practicable, if necessary, if applicable mean?

Rigorous editing and rewriting will increase the chances. Do not leave out important information. Writing is work, and no simple formula is going to produce the quality product desired every time.

Using jargon may make the writer feel good. Non-specific language When introducing a unit on language in writing seminars, I often start with an excerpt from a pharmaceutical standard operating procedure I once edited: The concept you are trying to describe is complicated; it needs to be explained clearly.

When writing is central to the job of assuring health, safety, and quality, can you afford to be loose with language prone to misunderstanding? Ask the chemist or microbiologist to explain the purpose of inspecting the vials and the best time to make the inspection to assure the intended outcome.

So give yourself a hard time — and ask others who review your work to do the same. Obtain medical advice before taking non-prescription drugs.

Language as Quality Control...

Please find the defibrillator. Can you translate this statement: For my own peace of mind I would like to have a teleconference next week to deep-dive on our SOW to ensure we have the specificity needed for project success and our mutual comfort. Also, if you do not want certain people contacted, please tell me why they should not be contacted.

Like getting stuck in quicksand, the more the writer tried to climb out of this explanation, the heavier the text became and soon suffocated the meaning. As an editor and writer, he has helped companies improve their client correspondence, project documentation, proposals, and marketing materials.

Steven Schultz is President of Writing at Work email: Why take the chance? Using simple, objective language closes loopholes. How will the reader know?

When editing for clarity, ask yourself, is this specific enough, will this produce consistent results, could two people interpret it in more than one way? Nonetheless, jargon makes the job of reading more complicated, abstract, and longer than necessary.Steven Schultz, Ph.D., started Writing at Work in to provide writing and editing services, along with training in writing, communications, and leadership.

Writing at Work's seminars and workshops focus on improving the writing skills of those who, regardless of profession, need to write for their President at Writing at Work, Inc.

Steven Schultz, Ph.D., is the president of Writing at Work, the company he started in to provide business and technical writing services to corporations, professional organizations, and government agencies.

President at Writing at Work, Inc. Writing at Work, Inc., is a silver sponsor of PSMJ’s summit this December 3 – 4 in San Francisco for leading firms in the A/E/C industry—architecture, engineering, and construction.

Technical Writing at Work Steven Schultz Writing at Work, Inc. Short Course # Length: 1 Day Course Date: 03/07/ – Tuesday Fee: $ ($ after 2/18/17) More Course Info Be sure to check out Steve’s other Short Course: Writing for Excellent Customer Service and Support (course #91) Target Audience Well read more →.

About the Author: Steven P. Schultz, Ph.D., the president of Writing at Work, Inc., provides writing and editing services along with training seminars to engineering and architectural firms across the U.S. As an editor and writer, he has helped companies improve their client correspondence, project documentation, proposals, and marketing.

Caution—Writers at Work! 5 Writing Hazards Ahead –Steve Schultz Of the many writing resources available to the architecture, engineering, and construction industry, the onstruction Specifications Institute’s Manual of Practice offers four C’s for effective communication: CLEAR.

Steve schultz writing at work
Rated 0/5 based on 97 review