An analysis of principles of scientific management

This mass of rule-of-thumb or traditional knowledge may be said to be the principal asset or possession of every tradesman.

This will help in saving time as well as human energy. First, owing to the fact that he happened not to be of working parents, the owners of the company believed that he had the interest of the works more at heart than the other workmen, and they therefore had more confidence in his word than they did in that of the machinists who were under him.

His workman friends came to him continually and asked him, in a personal, friendly way, whether he would advise them, for their own best interest, to turn out more work. All of this requires the kindly cooperation of the management, and involves a much more elaborate organization and system than the old-fashioned herding of men in large gangs.

They worked to the best of their ability throughout the time that they were being observed. There was no one else available, and so, having more education than the other laborers since he had been prepared for college he was given the position of clerk.

In a comparatively short time Mr. Thus all of the planning which under the old system was done by the workman, as a result of his personal experience, must of necessity under the new system be done by the management in accordance with the laws of the science; because even if the workman was well suited to the development and use of scientific data, it would be physically impossible for him to work at his machine and at a desk at the same time.

Principles of Scientific Management

Group action with mutual-trust and understanding should be perfect understanding the focus of working. A large shovel tool room was built, in which were stored not only shovels but carefully designed and standardized labor implements of all kinds, such as picks, crowbars, etc. These promote individual responsibility, and seek to push decision making through all levels of the organization.

There is an almost equal division of the work and the responsibility between the management and the workmen.

5 Principles of Scientific Management: Propounded by Taylor

Some years later, when more ,money was available for this purpose, a second series of experiments was made, similar to the first, but somewhat more thorough. An inclined plank was placed against the side of a car, and each man picked up from his pile a pig of iron weighing about 92 pounds, walked up the inclined plank and dropped it on the end of the car.

He argued that the most important object of both the employee and the management should be the training and development of each individual in the establishment, so that he can do the highest class of work for which his natural abilities fit him.

These tasks are carefully planned, so that both good and careful work are called for in their performance, but it should be distinctly understood that in no case is the workman called upon to work at a pace which would be injurious to his health.

The writer does not wish it to be understood that this is the whole of the art or science of shovelling. He started the Scientific Management movement, and he and his associates were the first people to study the work process scientifically.

And indeed it would be if applied to an educated mechanic, or even an intelligent laborer. Taylor devotes most of the remainder of the work to providing case studies to support his case, including: And, briefly, through a series of illustrations, to convince the reader that whenever these principles are correctly applied, results must follow which are truly astounding.

The writer has put the problem before many good managers, and asked them whether, under premium work, piece work, or any of the ordinary plans of management, they would be likely even to approximate 47 tons [ 4 ] per man per day, and not a man has suggested that an output of over 18 to 25 tons could be attained by any of the ordinary expedients.

Fundamentals of Scientific Management, and Chapter 2: This is announced as a general principle, the truth of which will become apparent as one illustration after another is given. Taylor demonstrated that maximum prosperity can exist only as the result of maximum productivity, both for the shop and individual, and rebuked the idea that the fundamental interests of employees and employers are necessarily antagonistic.

To point out, through a series of simple illustrations, the great loss which the whole country is suffering through inefficiency in almost all of our daily acts.

Every element in any way connected with the work which we believed could have a bearing on the result was carefully studied and recorded.

The ingenuity and experience of each generation — of each decade, even, have without doubt handed over better methods to the next.

It should always be kept in mind that prosperity for an employer cannot exist for a long time unless it is accompanied by the prosperity of the employees of that organisation and vice versa.

In dealing with workmen under this type of management, it is an inflexible rule to talk to and deal with only one man at a time, since each workman has his own special abilities and limitations, and since we are not dealing with men in masses, but are trying to develop each individual man to his highest state of efficiency and prosperity.

He stated, however, that he did not believe that any scientific study of this sort would give results of much value. There were about shovelers and laborers of this general class in the yard of the Bethlehem Steel Company at this time. Now one of the very first requirements for a man who is fit to handle pig iron as a regular occupation is that he shall be so stupid and so phlegmatic that he more nearly resembles in his mental make-up the ox than any other type.

By having [another] man, however, who understood this law [governing the tiring effect of heavy labor], stand over him and direct his work, day after day, until he acquired the habit of resting at proper intervals, [Schmidt] was able to work at an even gait all day long without unduly tiring himself.

To attain the efficiency, steps should be taken right from the process of selection of employees. And it was found on studying the rule-of-thumb plan at the Bethlehem Steel Company, where each shoveler owned his own shovel, that he would frequently go from shovelling ore, with a load of about 30 pounds per shovel, to handling rice coal, with a load on the same shovel of less than 4 pounds.

This means replacement of odd rule of thumb by the use of method of enquiry, investigation, data collection, analysis and framing of rules.

With a man of the mentally sluggish type of Schmidt it is appropriate and not unkind, since it is effective in fixing his attention on the high wages which he wants and away from what, if it were called to his attention, he probably would consider impossibly hard work.

In a war of this kind the workmen have one expedient which is usually effective. While there are perhaps "forty, fifty, or a hundred ways of doing each act in each trade", "there is always one method and one implement which is quicker and better than any of the rest".

This ultimately helps to attain efficiency and prosperity for both organisation and the employees. The selection of the man, then, does not involve finding some extraordinary individual, but merely picking out from among very ordinary men the few who are especially suited to this type of work.

Both of them should visualize themselves as two pillars whose soundness alone can ensure achievement of common goals of the organisation.Moreover, Taylor’s Principles of Scientific Management Taylor’s “Scientific Management Principles”: Contemporary Issues in Personnel Selection Period.

Hakan Turan.

performance/job analysis, work study and work design in today’s human resources management. The second principle. Principles of Scientific Management Development of Science for each part of men’s job (replacement of rule of thumb) This principle suggests that work assigned to any employee should be observed, analyzed with respect to each and every element and part and time involved in it.

Four Principles of Scientific Management Taylor's four principles are as follows: Replace working by "rule of thumb," or simple habit and common sense, and instead use the scientific method to study work and determine the.

Frederick Winslow Taylor published his work, “The Principles of Scientific Management” inin it, Taylor described the application of the scientific method to. Under scientific management the “initiative” of the workmen (that is, their hard work, their good-will, and their ingenuity) is obtained with absolute uniformity and to a greater extent than is possible under the old system; and in Frederick Winslow Taylor The Principles of.

Scientific management theory was developed in the early 20th century by Frederick W.

Frederick Taylor and Scientific Management

Taylor. We will be exploring the primary principles of scientific management and some of its key contributors.

An analysis of principles of scientific management
Rated 5/5 based on 91 review